cswork / libraryOpen practice workspace

Interview guides · KPMG

KPMG Software Engineer Interview Guide

KPMG Software Engineer interview guide: reported rounds, questions and how candidates describe the process.

The 60-second brief

As a Software Engineer at KPMG, you operate at the intersection of high-level business consulting and cutting-edge technical execution. This role is not merely about writing code; it is about architecting digital solutions that solve complex, multi-faceted problems for a global portfolio of clients. You will contribute to the development of robust applications, AI-driven tools, and scalable interfaces that form the backbone of KPMG’s service offerings. The impact of your work is significant, as you are often responsible for bridging the gap between abstract client requirements and tangible, efficient software products. You will likely collaborate with cross-functional teams—ranging from data scientists to business analysts—to drive innovation in areas like cloud infrastructure, web development, and process automation.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at KPMG.

Focus areas

  • Python
  • React
  • Object-Oriented Programming (OOP)

The KPMG interview process

KPMG candidates report 4 rounds over 3-5 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

Online Application

Submit your application through the online portal.

What to demonstrate

  • Submit your application through the online portal
  • Depth in Python

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: These questions assess your grasp of the core technologies listed in your CV and your ability to apply them to real-world scenarios.
  • Answer aloud and timed: Can you explain the core principles of OOP and how you apply them in your daily work?

Initial Screening

Includes psychometric or technical assessments to evaluate candidates.

What to demonstrate

  • Includes psychometric or technical assessments to evaluate candidates
  • Depth in Python

How to prepare

  • Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
  • Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.

Technical Rounds

One or two rounds involving live coding, home tasks, or system design discussions.

What to demonstrate

  • One or two rounds involving live coding, home tasks, or system design discussions
  • Depth in Python

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: What are the most common security vulnerabilities in Web APIs, and how do you mitigate them?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Can you describe a scenario where you had to debug a complex issue in an Angular or React environment?

Behavioral/HR Interview

Assess alignment with company values through behavioral questions.

What to demonstrate

  • Assess alignment with company values through behavioral questions
  • Depth in Python

How to prepare

  • Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
  • Re-read the description of the behavioral/hr interview above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.

Where candidates lose points

Prepare for the Language Requirement

If you are applying to an international office, ensure you are fully prepared to conduct the interview in the language requested by the recruitment team.

Know Your CV Inside Out

Every project or technology you list on your CV is fair game. Be prepared to go deep into the "why" behind your technical decisions.

Show Genuine Curiosity

When asked if you have questions, ask about the team culture, the specific challenges of their current projects, and how the team handles technical debt.

Practice Soft Skills

Remember that at KPMG, you are a consultant as much as an engineer. Your ability to explain why a solution is good for the business is just as important as the code itself.

Questions & practice

These questions assess your grasp of the core technologies listed in your CV and your ability to apply them to

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

These questions assess your grasp of the core technologies listed in your CV and your ability to apply them to real-world scenarios.

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

Can you explain the core principles of OOP and how you apply them in your daily work?

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

What are the key differences between ASP.NET and other web frameworks you have used?

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

How do you manage memory and performance in Python applications?

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

What are the most common security vulnerabilities in Web APIs, and how do you mitigate them?

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

This category focuses on your logical reasoning and your ability to write clean, efficient code under pressure

Medium · Problem Solving and Algorithms

This category focuses on your logical reasoning and your ability to write clean, efficient code under pressure.

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

How would you approach a problem involving dynamic programming?

Medium · Problem Solving and Algorithms

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Can you describe your process for manipulating large strings efficiently?

Medium · Problem Solving and Algorithms

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

How do you determine the optimal data structure for a specific system requirement?

Medium · Problem Solving and Algorithms

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Walk me through the steps you would take to optimize a slow-running database query.

Medium · Problem Solving and Algorithms

Approach

  1. Name the grain you start from and join outward from it.
  2. Check whether any join is one-to-many before aggregating, or the sums inflate.
  3. Say which index the query would use, and what makes it unusable.
  4. Handle the rows that do not match: that is usually the actual question.

Follow-up

  • How does the query change if that join becomes one-to-many?
  • What happens to this when the table is ten times larger?

Find version gaps and relay lag with window functions

Medium · window functions · event tables · frame semantics

outbox_event holds event_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status ('pending','published','dead'), attempts, created_at, published_at. A projection is missing rows and you must decide whether the relay skipped events or the consumer dropped them. Write three queries over the last seven days: one listing every aggregate_id whose published aggregate_version sequence has a hole, one giving per-day counts with a running total, and one returning the newest published event per aggregate. For each, say where the window function is evaluated relative to WHERE and LIMIT. PostgreSQL 16.

Approach

  1. Gaps: compute lead(aggregate_version) OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version) in a subquery, then filter next_version <> aggregate_version + 1 in the outer query. Window functions are evaluated after WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING and before the outer ORDER BY and LIMIT, so the predicate cannot sit in the same WHERE clause and PostgreSQL 16 has no QUALIFY.
  2. Say what the seven-day filter does to the answer: it truncates every partition, so the first row per aggregate has no predecessor inside the window and a hole spanning the boundary is invisible. Widen the window, or join to resource.version as the authority for the true maximum.
  3. Running total: SELECT date_trunc('day', created_at) AS d, count() AS n, sum(count()) OVER (ORDER BY date_trunc('day', created_at) ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING). An aggregate inside a window call is legal because grouping runs before windowing. The grouping key is unique per row here so ROWS and RANGE agree, but write the frame anyway — over ungrouped rows with tied timestamps the default RANGE frame pulls in every peer row and the total jumps.
  4. Newest per aggregate: DISTINCT ON (aggregate_id) ... ORDER BY aggregate_id, aggregate_version DESC is the cheap PostgreSQL-only form when an index matches that order; row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version DESC) = 1 is the portable form and needs a subquery for the same evaluation-order reason as the gap query.

Follow-up

  • Relay failover redelivers events. Does a duplicate break the gap query, and how would you detect one from this table alone?
  • Turn the gap check into a continuous monitor rather than a query someone runs after an incident. What does it watch?

These questions test your ability to think about the "big picture" of a software system.

Medium · System Design and Architecture

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

How does the Internet work at a high level when a user requests a web page?

Medium · System Design and Architecture

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

How would you design a scalable architecture for a real-time data processing application?

Medium · System Design and Architecture

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

What are the trade-offs between different Azure deployment strategies?

Medium · System Design and Architecture

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

How would you integrate an AI model into a standard frontend interface?

Medium · System Design and Architecture

Approach

  1. Say who the caller is and what they do when the call fails halfway.
  2. Define the identity of a request so a retry cannot double-apply it.
  3. Separate accepted, pending, failed and confirmed; they are different facts.
  4. Design the error taxonomy before the success shape; callers branch on it.

Follow-up

  • What happens if the caller retries after a timeout?
  • How does a client discover it is on an old version of this contract?

Can you describe a scenario where you had to debug a complex issue in an Angular or React environment?

Medium · Technical Fundamentals and Language Prof

Approach

  1. Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
  2. Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
  3. Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
  4. Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.

Follow-up

  • What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
  • How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?

Suggested practice checklist

Built from the rounds and topics KPMG candidates report.

Day 1 — Map the KPMG loop

  • Write out the reported sequence: Online Application, Initial Screening, Technical Rounds, Behavioral/HR Interview.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

Day 2 — Work Python

  • Spend the session on Python, which KPMG candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Python and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Python.

Day 3 — Work React

  • Spend the session on React, which KPMG candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in React and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in React.

Day 4 — Work Object-Oriented Programming (OOP)

  • Spend the session on Object-Oriented Programming (OOP), which KPMG candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Object-Oriented Programming (OOP).

Day 5 — Answer out loud: Technical Fundamentals and Language Proficiency

  • Answer aloud, timed: These questions assess your grasp of the core technologies listed in your CV and your ability to apply them to real-world scenarios.
  • Answer aloud, timed: Can you explain the core principles of OOP and how you apply them in your daily work?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical Fundamentals and Language Proficiency question(s), under time.

Day 6 — Answer out loud: Problem Solving and Algorithms

  • Answer aloud, timed: This category focuses on your logical reasoning and your ability to write clean, efficient code under pressure.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach a problem involving dynamic programming?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Problem Solving and Algorithms question(s), under time.

Day 7 — Answer out loud: System Design and Architecture

  • Answer aloud, timed: These questions test your ability to think about the "big picture" of a software system.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How does the Internet work at a high level when a user requests a web page?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported System Design and Architecture question(s), under time.

Behavioural preparation

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

These questions evaluate your soft skills, your approach to teamwork, and your alignment with KPMG’s professio

Medium · Behavioral and Leadership

These questions evaluate your soft skills, your approach to teamwork, and your alignment with KPMG’s professional standards.

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Tell me about a time you had to manage a tight deadline while working with a team.

Medium · Behavioral and Leadership

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you handle disagreements regarding technical direction with your peers or managers?

Medium · Behavioral and Leadership

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a situation where you had to prioritize tasks in a high-pressure environment.

Medium · Behavioral and Leadership

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

What motivates you to stay updated with the latest technological trends?

Medium · Behavioral and Leadership

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?