cswork / libraryOpen practice workspace

Interview guides · Eloelo

Eloelo Software Engineer Interview Guide

Eloelo Software Engineer interview guide: reported rounds, questions and how candidates describe the process.

The 60-second brief

As a Software Engineer at Eloelo, you are at the core of building one of India's most dynamic live-streaming and social gaming platforms. Your work directly impacts how millions of users interact, consume real-time content, and participate in interactive games. You will be responsible for building scalable backend services, optimizing frontend performance to ensure low-latency experiences, and architecting features that drive user engagement. This role is both challenging and high-impact. Because Eloelo operates in a fast-paced environment, you will often work on complex problems involving real-time data synchronization and high-concurrency systems. You will collaborate closely with product managers and designers to transform abstract ideas into robust technical implementations, making this an ideal position for engineers who thrive on product ownership and rapid iteration.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at Eloelo.

Focus areas

  • DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms)
  • Problem Solving
  • System Design

The Eloelo interview process

Eloelo candidates report 3 rounds over 3-5 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

Initial Screening Call

A call with a recruiter or HR to discuss your background and interest in the company.

What to demonstrate

  • A call with a recruiter or HR to discuss your background and interest in the company
  • Depth in DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms)

How to prepare

  • Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
  • Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.

Technical Rounds

Interviews focusing on core language expertise, data structures, and algorithms.

What to demonstrate

  • Interviews focusing on core language expertise, data structures, and algorithms
  • Depth in DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms)

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you manage state effectively in complex JavaScript applications?
  • Answer aloud and timed: What are the common security vulnerabilities in web applications, and how do you mitigate them?

Managerial Round

Integrates system design assessment with behavioral evaluation.

What to demonstrate

  • Integrates system design assessment with behavioral evaluation
  • Depth in DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms)

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: Explain how you would handle asynchronous data fetching and error handling in a production environment.
  • Answer aloud and timed: Given an array of integers, find the longest subarray with a sum equal to K.

Where candidates lose points

Own your narrative

Be prepared to talk about your past projects in detail, specifically the challenges you faced and how you overcame them.

Communicate your process

During coding rounds, the interviewer is more interested in how you think than just the final answer; talk through your assumptions.

Stay persistent

The hiring process can sometimes be slow; follow up politely but consistently if you are interested in the role.

Align with the mission

Familiarize yourself with the Eloelo product; showing that you understand the user experience is a major plus.

Questions & practice

Explain how you would handle asynchronous data fetching and error handling in a production environment.

Medium · Technical & Domain Expertise

Approach

  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.

Follow-up

  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

Given an array of integers, find the longest subarray with a sum equal to K.

Medium · Problem Solving & DSA

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Implement a basic version of a task scheduler or a priority queue.

Medium · Problem Solving & DSA

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Describe an approach to finding the shortest path in a graph where edge weights are dynamic.

Medium · Problem Solving & DSA

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Explain the time and space complexity of your solution for the provided coding challenge.

Medium · Problem Solving & DSA

Approach

  1. Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
  2. Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
  3. Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
  4. State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.

Follow-up

  • How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
  • What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?

Explain why the owner filter ignores the listing index

Medium · composite index · query plans · sort elimination

The only index on resource is (tenant_id, status, updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC). A new endpoint returns one user's resources across all statuses, newest created first: WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND owner_user_id = $2 ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20. On a tenant with 2M rows it takes 900 ms and EXPLAIN shows a sort above a large scan. Explain precisely why the existing index cannot serve it, give the index that can, and state which of these the new index still will not help: owner_user_id alone across tenants; the same query ordered by updated_at. PostgreSQL 16.

Approach

  1. Separate the two jobs an index does. For filtering, a composite btree is seekable only on a left prefix, so with no predicate on status the scan can at best range over tenant_id and test owner_user_id per row; PostgreSQL 16 has no btree skip scan to jump the unconstrained column.
  2. For ordering, the index is sorted by (status, updated_at) within a tenant and not by created_at, so the LIMIT cannot stop early: every matching row is read and then sorted. That is the 'Sort Method: top-N heapsort' line, and it is why the plan reads 2M rows to answer with 20.
  3. Derive the replacement from the access path — equality, equality, then the ordering column: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON resource (tenant_id, owner_user_id, created_at DESC). The scan seeks to the (tenant, owner) range and walks 20 entries in order, so the Sort node disappears along with the row-read.
  4. Treat INCLUDE (title, status) as conditional, not free. An index-only scan still visits the heap for any row whose page is not marked all-visible, so on a table taking 1.2k writes/second the win depends on autovacuum keeping the visibility map current, and the wider index costs more on every insert.

Follow-up

  • 90% of rows are status='active'. Would a partial index WHERE status = 'active' change your answer, and for which of the three queries?
  • A dashboard runs this for 40 owners in one page load. What changes about the design?

Stop tag and share joins from fanning out a page

Medium · join fan-out · semi-joins · many-to-many

resource_tag is (resource_id, tag_id) with PK (resource_id, tag_id); resource_share is (resource_id, shared_with_user_id, permission). The tagged-and-shared listing inner-joins resource to both, filters tenant_id, tag_id = ANY($2) and shared_with_user_id = $3, orders by updated_at DESC and takes 50. Pages come back with fewer than 50 distinct resources and the total in the header is far too high. Explain the row multiplication, rewrite both the page query and the count query so each is correct, and name the index each one needs. PostgreSQL 16.

Approach

  1. Do the arithmetic against the predicates that are actually there. An inner join emits one row per matching child row, and both joins are filtered: tag_id = ANY($2) admits only the requested tags, shared_with_user_id = $3 admits one user's share rows. So a resource holding three of the requested tags and shared with $3 once yields three rows, not one — the multiplier is its count of matching tags times its share rows for that single user, and that second factor is 1 unless the table admits duplicate (resource_id, shared_with_user_id) pairs. LIMIT 50 then limits rows rather than resources, and COUNT(*) counts pairs — the header is the product, not the population.
  2. Reject DISTINCT as the fix. It deduplicates after the product has been built, so the planner must materialise and sort the fanned-out set before the LIMIT can apply, and it leaves any SUM or AVG in the same select list wrong.
  3. Rewrite both filters as semi-joins, keeping resource as the only row source: AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM resource_tag rt WHERE rt.resource_id = r.resource_id AND rt.tag_id = ANY($2)) and the same shape against resource_share. A semi-join stops at the first match per resource and preserves the driving index order, so ORDER BY updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC LIMIT 50 still stops after 50 rows.
  4. Count with the same predicates and no join at all: SELECT count(*) FROM resource r WHERE r.tenant_id = $1 AND r.status = 'active' AND EXISTS (...) AND EXISTS (...). Nothing multiplies a resource, so the number is the population.

Follow-up

  • The filter changes from 'any of these tags' to 'all of these tags'. Rewrite it and state what it costs relative to the ANY form.
  • A resource can be shared with the same user twice under different permissions. Does your count change, and should it?

How do you optimize rendering performance in a large-scale React.js application?

Medium · Technical & Domain Expertise

Approach

  1. Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
  2. State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
  3. Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
  4. Work from the requirement backwards to the design.

Follow-up

  • What assumption would you test first?
  • How would you know your answer was wrong?

Explain the difference between server-side rendering and client-side rendering in the context of user experien

Medium · Technical & Domain Expertise

Explain the difference between server-side rendering and client-side rendering in the context of user experience.

Approach

  1. Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
  2. State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
  3. Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
  4. Work from the requirement backwards to the design.

Follow-up

  • What assumption would you test first?
  • How would you know your answer was wrong?

How do you manage state effectively in complex JavaScript applications?

Medium · Technical & Domain Expertise

Approach

  1. Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
  2. State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
  3. Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
  4. Work from the requirement backwards to the design.

Follow-up

  • What assumption would you test first?
  • How would you know your answer was wrong?

What are the common security vulnerabilities in web applications, and how do you mitigate them?

Medium · Technical & Domain Expertise

Approach

  1. Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
  2. State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
  3. Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
  4. Work from the requirement backwards to the design.

Follow-up

  • What assumption would you test first?
  • How would you know your answer was wrong?

How would you design a rate-limiter for an API endpoint?

Medium · Problem Solving & DSA

Approach

  1. Say who the caller is and what they do when the call fails halfway.
  2. Define the identity of a request so a retry cannot double-apply it.
  3. Separate accepted, pending, failed and confirmed; they are different facts.
  4. Design the error taxonomy before the success shape; callers branch on it.

Follow-up

  • What happens if the caller retries after a timeout?
  • How does a client discover it is on an old version of this contract?

Design a live-streaming architecture that supports thousands of concurrent users.

Medium · System Design & Behavioral

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

How do you balance the need for rapid feature development with the necessity of maintaining clean, scalable co

Medium · System Design & Behavioral

How do you balance the need for rapid feature development with the necessity of maintaining clean, scalable code?

Approach

  1. Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
  2. Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
  3. Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
  4. State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.

Follow-up

  • What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
  • How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?

p99 jumped on one listing filter while p50 stayed flat

Medium · query planning · composite index · percentiles

After a release that added an owner_user_id filter to the resource listing, p99 rose from 90 ms to 1.9 s while p50 stayed at 40 ms. Traffic and row counts are unchanged. resource carries the index (tenant_id, status, updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC). The new query filters tenant_id and owner_user_id, orders by updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC, and takes 20 rows. On PostgreSQL, explain the shape of the regression, prove it from a query plan, and give the index you would add.

Approach

  1. Start from the shape. A flat p50 with a moved p99 means a subset of requests changed cost, not all of them, so the first job is naming the subset. Bucket the endpoint's latency by the tenant's row count; the natural hypothesis is that large tenants are a small share of requests and all of the tail.
  2. Get the plan for the new query on a large tenant with EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS). Expect an index scan over the tenant's range, a filter discarding most of it, then a Sort feeding the Limit, possibly reporting Sort Method: external merge Disk. Read actual rows on the scan node, not estimated.
  3. Explain why the existing index cannot serve it. A composite B-tree is seekable only as a left prefix, and with no equality predicate on status the scan cannot treat updated_at as an ordering, because rows in the tenant's range are ordered by status first. Everything matching must be read and sorted before LIMIT 20 can apply, so a tenant with 400,000 rows pays 400,000 rows to return 20.
  4. Add (tenant_id, owner_user_id, updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC). Equality on the first two columns leaves the index ordered by updated_at within that pair, so the plan becomes an index scan that stops after 20 rows with no Sort node. PostgreSQL can scan a B-tree backwards, so the DESC markers matter only if the two sort columns ever disagree in direction; keeping them explicit documents the order the keyset cursor depends on.

Follow-up

  • The endpoint paginates with OFFSET. What does page 500 cost with your index, and what does the keyset version cost?
  • How would you have caught this before release, given that a 10,000-row seed database produces the same plan shape at an unnoticeable cost?

Suggested practice checklist

Built from the rounds and topics Eloelo candidates report.

Day 1 — Map the Eloelo loop

  • Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening Call, Technical Rounds, Managerial Round.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 3 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

Day 2 — Work DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms)

  • Spend the session on DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms), which Eloelo candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms) and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in DSA (Data Structures and Algorithms).

Day 3 — Work Problem Solving

  • Spend the session on Problem Solving, which Eloelo candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Problem Solving and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Problem Solving.

Day 4 — Work System Design

  • Spend the session on System Design, which Eloelo candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in System Design and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in System Design.

Day 5 — Answer out loud: Technical & Domain Expertise

  • Answer aloud, timed: How do you optimize rendering performance in a large-scale React.js application?
  • Answer aloud, timed: Explain the difference between server-side rendering and client-side rendering in the context of user experience.

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical & Domain Expertise question(s), under time.

Day 6 — Answer out loud: Problem Solving & DSA

  • Answer aloud, timed: Given an array of integers, find the longest subarray with a sum equal to K.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How would you design a rate-limiter for an API endpoint?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Problem Solving & DSA question(s), under time.

Day 7 — Answer out loud: System Design & Behavioral

  • Answer aloud, timed: Design a live-streaming architecture that supports thousands of concurrent users.
  • Answer aloud, timed: Tell me about a time you had a technical disagreement with a teammate; how did you resolve it?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported System Design & Behavioral question(s), under time.

Behavioural preparation

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

Tell me about a time you had a technical disagreement with a teammate; how did you resolve it?

Medium · System Design & Behavioral

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a project where you faced a significant performance bottleneck and how you solved it.

Medium · System Design & Behavioral

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Why do you want to work at Eloelo, and what do you think is our biggest technical challenge?

Medium · System Design & Behavioral

Approach

  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.

Follow-up

  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?